Mount Morgan Mine Upper Mundic Gully TSF EA Amendment

Consequence Category

Environmental harm

High

Significant

Low

Location such that: a) Contaminants may be released to areas of MNES, MSES or HEV waters that are not already authorised to be disturbed to at least the same extent under other conditions of this authority subject to any applicable offset commitment (Significant Values); and b) Adverse effects on Significant Values are likely; and c) The adverse effects are likely to cause at least one of the following: i) loss or damage or remedial costs greater than $50,000,000; or ii) remediation of damage is likely to take 3 years or more; or iii) permanent alteration to existing ecosystems; or iv) the area of damage (including downstream effects) is likely to be at least 5km 2 .

Location such that contaminants may be released so that adverse effects (that are not already authorised to be disturbed to at least the same extent under other conditions of the authority subject to any applicable offset commitment) either: a) Would be likely to be caused to Significant Values but those adverse effects would not be likely to meet the thresholds for the High consequence category and instead would be likely to cause at least one of the following: i) loss or damage or remedial costs greater than $10,000,000 but less than $50,000,000; or ii) remediation of damage is likely to take more than 6 months but less than 3 years; or iii) significant alteration to existing ecosystems; or iv) the area of damage (including downstream effects) is likely to be at least 1km 2 but less than 5km 2 . Or b) Would be likely to be caused to environmental values classed as slightly or moderately disturbed waters, wetland of general ecological significance, riverine areas, springs or lakes and associated flora and fauna (Moderate Values), and the adverse effects are likely to cause at least one of the following: i) loss or damage or remedial costs greater than $20,000,000; or ii) remediation of damage is likely to take more than 1 year; or iii) significant alteration to existing ecosystems; or iv) the area of damage (including downstream effects) is likely to be at least 2 km 2 . Location such that harm (other than a different category of harm as specified above) to third party assets in the failure path would be expected to require $1 million and greater but less than $10 million in rehabilitation, compensation, repair or rectification costs.

Location such that either: a) Contaminants are unlikely to be released to areas of Significant Values or Moderate Values; or b) Contaminants are likely to be released to those areas, but would be unlikely to meet any of the minimum thresholds specified for the Significant Consequence Category for adverse effects

General environmental harm

Location such that harm (other than a different category of harm as specified above) to third party assets in the failure path would be expected to require $10 million or greater in rehabilitation, compensation, repair or rectification costs.

Location such that harm (other than a different category of harm as specified above) to third party assets in the failure path would be expected to require less than $1 million in rehabilitation, compensation, repair or rectification costs.

General economic loss or property damage

Project No PS213278 Sandstone Gully TSF Dam Break and Consequence Category Assessments Mount Morgan Gold Mine Heritage Minerals

WSP January 2025 Page 25

Powered by